Re: Summit League and Area Teams in Postseason Tournaments
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:20 pm
Loyola coach Porter Moser to Oklahoma is picking up steam.
Fling out the Purple and the Gold, We're Marching On.
https://www.leathernecknation.net/forum/
https://www.leathernecknation.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2487
I wondered about this as I heard it mentioned for other conferences when they won their first round games, that they got extra money for the win that it would mean a lot to the conference. I'm sure the extra 75K will really come in handy to WIU coffers, esp. this year.ST_Lawson wrote: Mon Apr 05, 2021 8:38 am #3 Arizona falls in the Women's championship game, 54-53, to #1 Stanford
Sam Thomas played 37 minutes, had 7 rebounds and 1 steal.
Also, regarding Oral Roberts run in the NCAA tournament, not sure if you all realize this, but it means a bit of extra money for Western. The NCAA distributes money from the tournament to the conferences through a complicated system of "units"...conferences earn units for tournament wins. Essentially, Oral Roberts winning two games and making it to the Sweet 16 gets the conference a bit over $4M extra, distributed over 6 years and split among the 9 Summit League teams. What it means for Western is essentially an extra (roughly) $75k per year for 6 years going into our athletics budget that we were not expecting to have available. It's not a ton of money, but I bet it helps to ease the financial stress that this last year has caused...at least a little.
Here's an article that digs into the details a bit: https://www.inforum.com/bison-media-zon ... mit-League
Looks like the answer can be found here: https://www.sportico.com/leagues/colleg ... 234625281/meganeck wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 1:18 pm I wondered about this as I heard it mentioned for other conferences when they won their first round games, that they got extra money for the win that it would mean a lot to the conference. I'm sure the extra 75K will really come in handy to WIU coffers, esp. this year.
I wonder if it works that way on the women's side, Neither team won their 1st round game, but they did get 2 teams in this year. So does that get the conf any extra money?
If No. 1 seed Stanford wins the women’s NCAA Tournament, the Pac-12 won’t get a single penny for it. Unlike the men’s version, there’s no compensation for participation from the NCAA for either Stanford or its athletic conference. Women’s March Madness appearances aren’t factored into the NCAA’s annual distributions the way participation in the men’s tournament is.
Ok thank you Scott.ST_Lawson wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:24 pmLooks like the answer can be found here: https://www.sportico.com/leagues/colleg ... 234625281/meganeck wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 1:18 pm I wondered about this as I heard it mentioned for other conferences when they won their first round games, that they got extra money for the win that it would mean a lot to the conference. I'm sure the extra 75K will really come in handy to WIU coffers, esp. this year.
I wonder if it works that way on the women's side, Neither team won their 1st round game, but they did get 2 teams in this year. So does that get the conf any extra money?
The relevant bits are: Men's tournament makes ~$850 million from CBS and Turner; Women's tournament makes $41.8 from ESPN.
And:If No. 1 seed Stanford wins the women’s NCAA Tournament, the Pac-12 won’t get a single penny for it. Unlike the men’s version, there’s no compensation for participation from the NCAA for either Stanford or its athletic conference. Women’s March Madness appearances aren’t factored into the NCAA’s annual distributions the way participation in the men’s tournament is.