rocki wrote: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:40 am
Just a question, Scott. Do you think these students have also not been attending the football games at the high school they went to (while they were there, I mean)? If not, then there just doesn't appear to be interest in football at all. If they did, what made them want to go to those games and not the ones at the college they are now attending? I'm honestly just curious what other people think - is it too many electronics available to play with, or is it not feeling connected with the school/sport itself? I don't have a clue, myself. I go to every game I can, and I'm far beyond my college days, lol!!
Well, I think it's a combination of things (and it's different based on which "group" you're talking about):
I don't think that attendance is down at high schools (at least not much), so it's doesn't seem like just a general lack of football interest.
So, there's always the "hardcore" group of fans...people who will always go to the games. But, you go from a student population of ~15k to ~7.5k. Maybe before you had ~2,000 in your "hardcore" group...well, now you have ~1,000.
Next you have the people who are interested in football, but because they grew up being able to watch nearly any team from any part of the country live on TV/Computer...so they're Notre Dame fans, UCLA fans, Michigan fans, and Clemson fans, etc. If they can watch "their" team from the comfort of their dorm room, they're not going to be likely to head out to Hanson Field to watch Western play. When people say the internet has made the world smaller, this is what they mean. How easy would it have been for someone in the '70s to be a huge fan of...say University of Oregon football? How many games would a kid from the Chicago suburbs going to school in Macomb get to watch at home or at school if they wanted to watch the Oregon Ducks? I'm going to guess not many. How many Oregon games would a kid born in the same situation, but 40 years later, get to watch?...pretty much all of them. Many would be on ESPN, some would be on FS1, some on the Pac12 network, and even if they didn't get/subscribe to all of those...like it or not, they're all streaming for free (illegally) on the internet.
Then you have the people who would go to a game if they have nothing better to do. Well, now they can watch any show or movie they want to, play any game they want to, talk to their HS friends at other schools through social media, or do anything else they want to online. What % of these much more casual fans would go to a game if they have these other options? I don't know the answer, but I'm betting it's a lot fewer than the number who went back then.
There's another point that might be a thing, but I don't really know for sure. Have there always been huge schools in the Chicago area and suburbs, or were the schools smaller and were there more of them? I don't know the answer to this, but I know of people that I went to school with that had graduating classes of 1500 kids. That's a HS of like 6,000 people. You could easily have a decent number of students, plus local fans, alumni, parents, etc. who had regularly gone to HS games that have higher attendance, more community interest, and in a larger stadium than Western has.
It just seems like kids treat school as more of a place to just get in, get their degree, and get out...it's not something to have "spirit" for anymore. A few years removed and it's not really any different than spending 4 years working at fast food place...you spend most of you day there, you learn some stuff, you go do the next thing, and you don't really have much of a reason to go back. Kinda like you said...they just don't feel connected to the school in the same way that students did back then.
I'm not saying I have all the right answers. I'm pretty well removed from the current students myself (I'm now to the point where it's entirely possible for me to be the same age as some of their parents). This is just how it looks from my perspective and from what I've read in articles talking about the situation.